Presidential Elections: A Comparative Analysis of Ghana and Nigeria’s BVAS Implementation Challenges

The introduction of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) in Nigeria promised to revolutionize elections and eliminate long-standing credibility issues. However, its implementation has faced significant challenges, contrasting sharply with the success seen in Ghana. Below, we examine seven core reasons why BVAS may struggle to deliver its full potential in Nigeria, as revealed through an investigative comparison.

1. Integrity of Electoral Managers

Ghana’s Strength: Electoral officials in Ghana uphold high ethical standards, prioritizing transparency and fairness. Leaders like Kwadwo Afari-Gyan demonstrated integrity, fostering public trust and ensuring the successful deployment of BVAS.

Nigeria’s Weakness: The credibility of Nigerian electoral officials is frequently questioned. Accusations of bias, corruption, and complicity have tarnished the system’s reputation. This lack of integrity undermines the public’s trust in elections.

2. Non-Partisan Appointments

Ghana’s Approach: Ghana ensures electoral officials are selected based on merit and neutrality. This minimizes political interference and strengthens the credibility of election outcomes.

Nigeria’s Reality: In Nigeria, appointments often reflect political affiliations, with some officials linked to influential politicians or parties. Such partisanship raises concerns about intentional sabotage of BVAS operations.

3. Retention of Proven Leaders

Ghana’s Continuity: Ghana values institutional memory, retaining officials with a track record of credibility. For example, Kwadwo Afari-Gyan served as the chairperson of Ghana’s Electoral Commission for over two decades, contributing to electoral stability.

Nigeria’s Instability: Frequent leadership changes in Nigeria disrupt institutional growth. Respected electoral officials are often sidelined, undermining continuity and eroding public confidence in the system.

4. Accountability and Penalties for Malpractice

Ghana’s Deterrence: Ghana enforces strict penalties for electoral offenses, ensuring accountability. Special courts expedite cases, deterring misconduct.

Nigeria’s Laxity: Electoral malpractices in Nigeria often go unpunished. Officials implicated in wrongdoing are sometimes rewarded, perpetuating unethical behavior and discouraging adherence to BVAS protocols.

5. Technical Preparation and Implementation

Ghana’s Training: Electoral staff in Ghana undergo rigorous training to ensure the effective operation of BVAS. This minimizes technical errors during elections.

Nigeria’s Deficiency: Inadequate training of electoral staff in Nigeria compromises BVAS performance. Reports of server failures and human interference during elections further erode public confidence in the system.

—

6. Political Will and Stakeholder Commitment

Ghana’s Unity: Ghana’s electoral stakeholders demonstrate strong commitment to credible elections. Political will drives the successful implementation of BVAS.

Nigeria’s Fragmentation: In Nigeria, a lack of political will is evident. Stakeholders often manipulate the system for personal gain, undermining BVAS’s credibility and efficiency.

7. Constitutional Compliance

Ghana’s Adherence: Ghana follows constitutional provisions in appointing electoral officials, fostering trust in the process.

Nigeria’s Violations: In Nigeria, appointments often disregard constitutional requirements, with partisan officials approved despite concerns about their impartiality. This undermines public trust and hampers BVAS’s effectiveness.

Shrinking Voter Turnout: A Symptom of Public Distrust

The declining voter turnout in Nigeria highlights widespread disillusionment with the electoral process. From 69.1% participation in 2003 to just 26.7% in 2023, the trend reflects growing frustration with issues like logistical challenges, election-day violence, and doubts about vote integrity.

Lessons and Recommendations

To restore public confidence and ensure the success of BVAS, Nigeria must adopt the following measures:

1. Leadership with Integrity: Appoint leaders who prioritize public interest over personal or political gains.

2. Neutral Appointments: Select electoral officials based on merit and neutrality to reduce the risk of manipulation.

3. Accountability Mechanisms: Enforce strict penalties for electoral offenses to deter malpractice.

4. Comprehensive Training: Equip electoral staff with the necessary skills to manage BVAS effectively.

5. Political Will: Foster genuine commitment among stakeholders to uphold electoral integrity.

Conclusion

While BVAS has proven effective in Ghana, its challenges in Nigeria underscore the critical role of human factors in technological success. Without significant reforms, including integrity-driven leadership and non-partisan appointments, BVAS may fail to meet its potential. The 2027 elections will be a litmus test for Nigeria’s commitment to these reforms, as public confidence in the electoral process hangs in the balance.